The skinny vs. curvy debate: when will it end?
December 16th 2009 03:53
We've been hearing the same old story for decades now, and still it seems there is no end in sight. Does the fashion industry promote an unhealthy body image by using only very slim models on the catwalk? Would using larger models minimise the development of eating disorders in young girls, or would it be promoting obesity? Is fashion all about fantasies and ideals, or do we want to see "real girls" representing our "real world"? The questions go on and on, and yet, in late 2009 we are still no closer to getting any answers.
In October this year, iconic German designer Karl Lagerfeld made global headlines by making his rather brutal opinions on the size issue very, very clear. "No one wants to see curvy women," he was quoted as saying. "You've got fat mothers with their bags of chips sitting in front of the television and saying that thin models are ugly."
The designer concluded by saying that the fashion world was about "dreams and illusions" and dismissed the claims of popular fashion magazines wanting to cater for larger women as "absurd".
Other designers have heeded the cries of the world's larger ladies, and have made deliberate moves to use heavier models on the catwalk and in their advertising campaigns. In 2006 French designer Jean Paul Gaultier sent a size 20 model strutting down the catwalk at Paris Fashion Week, clad in a risque black corset and stockings. As would be expected it set the fashion industry ablaze, with some applauding Gaultier's move, others calling it a blatant publicity stunt and still others calling it counterproductive, in that the use of a clearly overweight model was an offense to healthy plus-sized models.
While larger models on the catwalk remain a rarity, they are more frequently popping up in magazines and ad campaigns promoting products to "real women", such as Dove's now-famous campaign for "real beauty". Glamour magazine also featured a flabby-bellied model in one of their photo shoots earlier this year, which prompted a wave of both criticism and admiration.
It's clear that designers, magazines and advertisers are listening to what society at large is saying, and some are even making moves to change existing modes of thinking.... but is it really what we want? If it is what the public wants, is it enough, or could you consider it to be mere tokenism?
Personally, I don't have a problem with thin models, provided that they are not unhealthy looking. I don't have a problem with plus-sized models either, provided that they, too, are not unhealthy looking. I would applaud diversity in the fashion industry, that is, models of all sizes, as long as they are the right shape for their size!
Put simply, seeing globs of fat hanging off a model's body is a sure-fire way to turn a healthy woman off the product or design being advertised. At the same time, seeing an emaciated model’s entire ribcage is also far from ideal. What we need to find is a happy medium: models who are representative of every size (and ethnicity!) while promoting neither anorexia nor obesity.
I have to say, I’m also pretty sick of hearing the words “real girl” and “real woman” thrown around with such reckless abandon as they have been of late. In my opinion, it reeks of bitterness to claim that just because a woman is genetically blessed, she is somehow fake, or alien. If models aren’t real women, then what are they?
And as for “real women have curves”? Sure they do, but real women also don’t have curves. We should be celebrating that diversity, rather than marginalizing women based upon their body shapes, and I think it’s up to the media and the fashion industry to the lead the charge.
So what do you think? Would you like to see models of all sizes, or would you prefer to keep the current fantasy ideals of fashion in place? Are you more disgusted by the too-thin or the overweight female figure? And what do you think should be done to end the skinny versus curvy debate, once and for all? Let me know your thoughts.
Which would you rather see?
In October this year, iconic German designer Karl Lagerfeld made global headlines by making his rather brutal opinions on the size issue very, very clear. "No one wants to see curvy women," he was quoted as saying. "You've got fat mothers with their bags of chips sitting in front of the television and saying that thin models are ugly."
The designer concluded by saying that the fashion world was about "dreams and illusions" and dismissed the claims of popular fashion magazines wanting to cater for larger women as "absurd".
Karl Lagerfeld likes them thin
Other designers have heeded the cries of the world's larger ladies, and have made deliberate moves to use heavier models on the catwalk and in their advertising campaigns. In 2006 French designer Jean Paul Gaultier sent a size 20 model strutting down the catwalk at Paris Fashion Week, clad in a risque black corset and stockings. As would be expected it set the fashion industry ablaze, with some applauding Gaultier's move, others calling it a blatant publicity stunt and still others calling it counterproductive, in that the use of a clearly overweight model was an offense to healthy plus-sized models.
Size 20 model Velvet d'Amour, on the Paris catwalk for Jean Paul Gaultier
While larger models on the catwalk remain a rarity, they are more frequently popping up in magazines and ad campaigns promoting products to "real women", such as Dove's now-famous campaign for "real beauty". Glamour magazine also featured a flabby-bellied model in one of their photo shoots earlier this year, which prompted a wave of both criticism and admiration.
One of the many images from Dove's campaign for 'real beauty'
Lizzie Miller in Glamour magazine
It's clear that designers, magazines and advertisers are listening to what society at large is saying, and some are even making moves to change existing modes of thinking.... but is it really what we want? If it is what the public wants, is it enough, or could you consider it to be mere tokenism?
Too thin? Probably.
Personally, I don't have a problem with thin models, provided that they are not unhealthy looking. I don't have a problem with plus-sized models either, provided that they, too, are not unhealthy looking. I would applaud diversity in the fashion industry, that is, models of all sizes, as long as they are the right shape for their size!
Put simply, seeing globs of fat hanging off a model's body is a sure-fire way to turn a healthy woman off the product or design being advertised. At the same time, seeing an emaciated model’s entire ribcage is also far from ideal. What we need to find is a happy medium: models who are representative of every size (and ethnicity!) while promoting neither anorexia nor obesity.
Beautiful models: not too thin, and not too fat
I have to say, I’m also pretty sick of hearing the words “real girl” and “real woman” thrown around with such reckless abandon as they have been of late. In my opinion, it reeks of bitterness to claim that just because a woman is genetically blessed, she is somehow fake, or alien. If models aren’t real women, then what are they?
And as for “real women have curves”? Sure they do, but real women also don’t have curves. We should be celebrating that diversity, rather than marginalizing women based upon their body shapes, and I think it’s up to the media and the fashion industry to the lead the charge.
Healthy, diverse, and fabulous!
So what do you think? Would you like to see models of all sizes, or would you prefer to keep the current fantasy ideals of fashion in place? Are you more disgusted by the too-thin or the overweight female figure? And what do you think should be done to end the skinny versus curvy debate, once and for all? Let me know your thoughts.
| 68 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
Comment by Michelle Sweeney
Competition Queen
Always Learning
Cinema Voyage
Comment by Journeywoman
Great Hair Style Tips
I Dream of Hollywood
Fashion Peach